Based on 179 and 5 real audits
| Metric | Google Play app | Stencil | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 34 | Google Play app |
| Accessibility | 88 | 83 | Google Play app |
| Best Practices | 86 | 93 | Stencil |
| SEO | 93 | 84 | Google Play app |
| Security | 66 | 70 | Stencil |
| TTFB | 228ms | 91ms | Stencil |
| Composite | 73 | 76 | Stencil |
Stencil outperforms Google Play app in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Google Play app leads in performance, accessibility, SEO.
Choose Google Play app when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Stencil when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 179 audited Google Play app sites and 5 audited Stencil sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback