Based on 4148 and 3 real audits
| Metric | Google Search Console | HighLevel | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 45 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 88 | 91 | HighLevel |
| Best Practices | 87 | 97 | HighLevel |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | HighLevel |
| Security | 68 | 71 | HighLevel |
| TTFB | 347ms | 473ms | Google Search Console |
| Composite | 74 | 77 | HighLevel |
HighLevel outperforms Google Search Console in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 74). Google Search Console leads in TTFB.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HighLevel when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 4148 audited Google Search Console sites and 3 audited HighLevel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback