Based on 3866 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Google Search Console | Kadence WP Kadence | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 56 | Kadence WP Kadence |
| Accessibility | 88 | 100 | Kadence WP Kadence |
| Best Practices | 86 | 81 | Google Search Console |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | Kadence WP Kadence |
| Security | 67 | 60 | Google Search Console |
| TTFB | 346ms | 105ms | Kadence WP Kadence |
| Composite | 73 | 77 | Kadence WP Kadence |
Kadence WP Kadence outperforms Google Search Console in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). Google Search Console leads in best practices, security.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Kadence WP Kadence when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3866 audited Google Search Console sites and 1 audited Kadence WP Kadence sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback