Based on 3817 and 8 real audits
| Metric | Google Search Console | KaTeX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 50 | KaTeX |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | Google Search Console |
| Best Practices | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| SEO | 90 | 94 | KaTeX |
| Security | 67 | 61 | Google Search Console |
| TTFB | 346ms | 228ms | KaTeX |
| Composite | 73 | 71 | Google Search Console |
Google Search Console and KaTeX are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Google Search Console has a composite score of 73 while KaTeX scores 71.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose KaTeX when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3817 audited Google Search Console sites and 8 audited KaTeX sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback