Based on 4233 and 9 real audits
| Metric | Google Search Console | Kentico CMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 40 | Google Search Console |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | Google Search Console |
| Best Practices | 87 | 81 | Google Search Console |
| SEO | 90 | 85 | Google Search Console |
| Security | 69 | 66 | Google Search Console |
| TTFB | 353ms | 355ms | Google Search Console |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Google Search Console |
Google Search Console outperforms Kentico CMS in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Kentico CMS leads in no categories.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Kentico CMS doesn't clearly lead Google Search Console in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 4233 audited Google Search Console sites and 9 audited Kentico CMS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback