Based on 3802 and 197 real audits
| Metric | Google Search Console | lit-element | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 37 | Google Search Console |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 86 | 87 | lit-element |
| SEO | 90 | 89 | Google Search Console |
| Security | 67 | 65 | Google Search Console |
| TTFB | 344ms | 279ms | lit-element |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Google Search Console outperforms lit-element in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). lit-element leads in best practices, TTFB.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose lit-element when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3802 audited Google Search Console sites and 197 audited lit-element sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback