Skip to content

Google Search Console vs Matomo Analytics

Based on 4391 and 161 real audits

View Google Search Console details | View Matomo Analytics details
MetricGoogle Search ConsoleMatomo AnalyticsWinner
Performance4752Matomo Analytics
Accessibility8888Tie
Best Practices8790Matomo Analytics
SEO9191Tie
Security6967Google Search Console
TTFB366ms424msGoogle Search Console
Composite7575Tie
Performance
Google Search Console
47
Matomo Analytics
52
Accessibility
Google Search Console
88
Matomo Analytics
88
Security
Google Search Console
69
Matomo Analytics
67
SEO
Google Search Console
91
Matomo Analytics
91
Composite
Google Search Console
75
Matomo Analytics
75

Google Search Console and Matomo Analytics are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Google Search Console has a composite score of 75 while Matomo Analytics scores 75.

When to choose Google Search Console

Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Matomo Analytics

Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 4391 audited Google Search Console sites and 161 audited Matomo Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Search Console or Matomo Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Matomo Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 47 on average).
Which has better security, Google Search Console or Matomo Analytics?
Google Search Console sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Search Console or Matomo Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Search Console (88 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Search Console or Matomo Analytics?
Google Search Console sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Search Console or Matomo Analytics?
Google Search Console sites show lower Time to First Byte (366 ms vs 424 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Search Console or Matomo Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Matomo Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Search Console may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback