Based on 3592 and 10 real audits
| Metric | Google Search Console | MediaWiki | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 90 | MediaWiki |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | Google Search Console |
| Best Practices | 86 | 96 | MediaWiki |
| SEO | 90 | 87 | Google Search Console |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 338ms | 202ms | MediaWiki |
| Composite | 73 | 78 | MediaWiki |
MediaWiki outperforms Google Search Console in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 73). Google Search Console leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose MediaWiki when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3592 audited Google Search Console sites and 10 audited MediaWiki sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback