Based on 3939 and 16 real audits
| Metric | Google Search Console | MediaWiki | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 84 | MediaWiki |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | Google Search Console |
| Best Practices | 86 | 97 | MediaWiki |
| SEO | 90 | 88 | Google Search Console |
| Security | 67 | 70 | MediaWiki |
| TTFB | 352ms | 170ms | MediaWiki |
| Composite | 74 | 79 | MediaWiki |
MediaWiki outperforms Google Search Console in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 74). Google Search Console leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose MediaWiki when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3939 audited Google Search Console sites and 16 audited MediaWiki sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback