Skip to content

Google Search Console vs Microsoft

Based on 4391 and 2550 real audits

View Google Search Console details | View Microsoft details
MetricGoogle Search ConsoleMicrosoftWinner
Performance4740Google Search Console
Accessibility8889Microsoft
Best Practices8786Google Search Console
SEO9189Google Search Console
Security6967Google Search Console
TTFB366ms336msMicrosoft
Composite7573Google Search Console
Performance
Google Search Console
47
Microsoft
40
Accessibility
Google Search Console
88
Microsoft
89
Security
Google Search Console
69
Microsoft
67
SEO
Google Search Console
91
Microsoft
89
Composite
Google Search Console
75
Microsoft
73

Google Search Console outperforms Microsoft in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Microsoft leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Google Search Console

Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 4391 audited Google Search Console sites and 2550 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Search Console or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Search Console sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (47 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, Google Search Console or Microsoft?
Google Search Console sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Search Console or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Search Console or Microsoft?
Google Search Console sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Search Console or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (336 ms vs 366 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Search Console or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Search Console scores higher on overall composite score while Google Search Console may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback