Skip to content

Google Search Console vs New Relic

Based on 3817 and 177 real audits

View Google Search Console details | View New Relic details
MetricGoogle Search ConsoleNew RelicWinner
Performance4435Google Search Console
Accessibility8889New Relic
Best Practices8685Google Search Console
SEO9090Tie
Security6765Google Search Console
TTFB346ms236msNew Relic
Composite7372Google Search Console
Performance
Google Search Console
44
New Relic
35
Accessibility
Google Search Console
88
New Relic
89
Security
Google Search Console
67
New Relic
65
SEO
Google Search Console
90
New Relic
90
Composite
Google Search Console
73
New Relic
72

Google Search Console outperforms New Relic in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). New Relic leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Google Search Console

Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose New Relic

Choose New Relic when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3817 audited Google Search Console sites and 177 audited New Relic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Search Console or New Relic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Search Console sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Google Search Console or New Relic?
Google Search Console sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Search Console or New Relic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor New Relic (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Search Console or New Relic?
Google Search Console sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Search Console or New Relic?
New Relic sites show lower Time to First Byte (236 ms vs 346 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Search Console or New Relic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Search Console scores higher on overall composite score while Google Search Console may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback