Based on 3866 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Google Search Console | Smarter Click | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 52 | Smarter Click |
| Accessibility | 88 | 91 | Smarter Click |
| Best Practices | 86 | 94 | Smarter Click |
| SEO | 90 | 100 | Smarter Click |
| Security | 67 | 67 | Tie |
| TTFB | 346ms | 328ms | Smarter Click |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Smarter Click outperforms Google Search Console in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Google Search Console leads in no categories.
Google Search Console doesn't clearly lead Smarter Click in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Smarter Click when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3866 audited Google Search Console sites and 2 audited Smarter Click sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback