Based on 4391 and 3 real audits
| Metric | Google Search Console | WP Google Map Plugin | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 47 | 46 | Google Search Console |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | Google Search Console |
| Best Practices | 87 | 96 | WP Google Map Plugin |
| SEO | 91 | 94 | WP Google Map Plugin |
| Security | 69 | 73 | WP Google Map Plugin |
| TTFB | 366ms | 763ms | Google Search Console |
| Composite | 75 | 79 | WP Google Map Plugin |
WP Google Map Plugin outperforms Google Search Console in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 75). Google Search Console leads in performance, accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose WP Google Map Plugin when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 4391 audited Google Search Console sites and 3 audited WP Google Map Plugin sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback