Based on 126 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Google Sign-in | PushAlert | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 35 | Google Sign-in |
| Accessibility | 89 | 93 | PushAlert |
| Best Practices | 84 | 92 | PushAlert |
| SEO | 92 | 100 | PushAlert |
| Security | 66 | 62 | Google Sign-in |
| TTFB | 315ms | 571ms | Google Sign-in |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Google Sign-in and PushAlert are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Google Sign-in has a composite score of 74 while PushAlert scores 74.
Choose Google Sign-in when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose PushAlert when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 126 audited Google Sign-in sites and 1 audited PushAlert sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback