| Metric | Google Sign-in | Wink | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 38 | Wink |
| Accessibility | 89 | 91 | Wink |
| Best Practices | 82 | 77 | Google Sign-in |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Wink |
| Security | 64 | 67 | Wink |
| TTFB | 286ms | 274ms | Wink |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Wink |
Wink outperforms Google Sign-in in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Google Sign-in leads in best practices.
Choose Google Sign-in when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Wink when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 107 audited Google Sign-in sites and 1 audited Wink sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback