Based on 2764 and 55 real audits
| Metric | Google Tag Manager | GraphQL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 29 | Google Tag Manager |
| Accessibility | 88 | 90 | GraphQL |
| Best Practices | 87 | 85 | Google Tag Manager |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | GraphQL |
| Security | 66 | 65 | Google Tag Manager |
| TTFB | 403ms | 297ms | GraphQL |
| Composite | 74 | 72 | Google Tag Manager |
Google Tag Manager outperforms GraphQL in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). GraphQL leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose GraphQL when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2764 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 55 audited GraphQL sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback