Skip to content

Google Tag Manager vs Gravity Forms

Based on 2504 and 4 real audits

View Google Tag Manager details | View Gravity Forms details
MetricGoogle Tag ManagerGravity FormsWinner
Performance4049Gravity Forms
Accessibility8891Gravity Forms
Best Practices8699Gravity Forms
SEO9192Gravity Forms
Security6566Gravity Forms
TTFB372ms277msGravity Forms
Composite7377Gravity Forms
Performance
Google Tag Manager
40
Gravity Forms
49
Accessibility
Google Tag Manager
88
Gravity Forms
91
Security
Google Tag Manager
65
Gravity Forms
66
SEO
Google Tag Manager
91
Gravity Forms
92
Composite
Google Tag Manager
73
Gravity Forms
77

Gravity Forms outperforms Google Tag Manager in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). Google Tag Manager leads in no categories.

When to choose Google Tag Manager

Google Tag Manager doesn't clearly lead Gravity Forms in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose Gravity Forms

Choose Gravity Forms when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2504 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 4 audited Gravity Forms sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Tag Manager or Gravity Forms?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Gravity Forms sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, Google Tag Manager or Gravity Forms?
Gravity Forms sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Tag Manager or Gravity Forms?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Gravity Forms (91 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Tag Manager or Gravity Forms?
Gravity Forms sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Tag Manager or Gravity Forms?
Gravity Forms sites show lower Time to First Byte (277 ms vs 372 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Tag Manager or Gravity Forms for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Gravity Forms scores higher on overall composite score while Google Tag Manager may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback