Based on 2813 and 3 real audits
| Metric | Google Tag Manager | Hostinger CDN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 55 | Hostinger CDN |
| Accessibility | 88 | 92 | Hostinger CDN |
| Best Practices | 87 | 98 | Hostinger CDN |
| SEO | 91 | 94 | Hostinger CDN |
| Security | 66 | 79 | Hostinger CDN |
| TTFB | 407ms | 681ms | Google Tag Manager |
| Composite | 74 | 81 | Hostinger CDN |
Hostinger CDN outperforms Google Tag Manager in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 74). Google Tag Manager leads in TTFB.
Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Hostinger CDN when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2813 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 3 audited Hostinger CDN sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback