Based on 3047 and 16 real audits
| Metric | Google Tag Manager | HubSpot WordPress plugin | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 41 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 87 | 84 | Google Tag Manager |
| SEO | 92 | 88 | Google Tag Manager |
| Security | 67 | 66 | Google Tag Manager |
| TTFB | 433ms | 491ms | Google Tag Manager |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | HubSpot WordPress plugin |
Google Tag Manager outperforms HubSpot WordPress plugin in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 75). HubSpot WordPress plugin leads in composite score.
Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
HubSpot WordPress plugin doesn't clearly lead Google Tag Manager in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 3047 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 16 audited HubSpot WordPress plugin sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback