Based on 2376 and 7 real audits
| Metric | Google Tag Manager | Kentico CMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 40 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 86 | 84 | Google Tag Manager |
| SEO | 91 | 87 | Google Tag Manager |
| Security | 64 | 63 | Google Tag Manager |
| TTFB | 356ms | 244ms | Kentico CMS |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | Google Tag Manager |
Google Tag Manager outperforms Kentico CMS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Kentico CMS leads in TTFB.
Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is SEO and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Kentico CMS when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2376 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 7 audited Kentico CMS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback