Based on 2764 and 14 real audits
| Metric | Google Tag Manager | Lenis | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 36 | Google Tag Manager |
| Accessibility | 88 | 89 | Lenis |
| Best Practices | 87 | 89 | Lenis |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Lenis |
| Security | 66 | 69 | Lenis |
| TTFB | 403ms | 319ms | Lenis |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | Lenis |
Lenis outperforms Google Tag Manager in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Google Tag Manager leads in performance.
Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Lenis when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2764 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 14 audited Lenis sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback