Based on 3047 and 14 real audits
| Metric | Google Tag Manager | List.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 48 | List.js |
| Accessibility | 88 | 80 | Google Tag Manager |
| Best Practices | 87 | 91 | List.js |
| SEO | 92 | 86 | Google Tag Manager |
| Security | 67 | 66 | Google Tag Manager |
| TTFB | 433ms | 468ms | Google Tag Manager |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Google Tag Manager outperforms List.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). List.js leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose List.js when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3047 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 14 audited List.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback