Skip to content

Google Tag Manager vs Loadable-Components

Based on 188 and 9 real audits

MetricGoogle Tag ManagerLoadable-ComponentsWinner
Performance3929Google Tag Manager
Accessibility9090Tie
Best Practices8993Loadable-Components
SEO9392Google Tag Manager
Security6466Loadable-Components
TTFB295ms136msLoadable-Components
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Google Tag Manager
39
Loadable-Components
29
Accessibility
Google Tag Manager
90
Loadable-Components
90
Security
Google Tag Manager
64
Loadable-Components
66
SEO
Google Tag Manager
93
Loadable-Components
92
Composite
Google Tag Manager
73
Loadable-Components
73

Loadable-Components outperforms Google Tag Manager in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Google Tag Manager leads in performance, SEO.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Tag Manager or Loadable-Components?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Tag Manager sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, Google Tag Manager or Loadable-Components?
Loadable-Components sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Should I choose Google Tag Manager or Loadable-Components for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Tag Manager scores higher on performance while Google Tag Manager may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback