Skip to content

Google Tag Manager vs New Relic

Based on 2504 and 177 real audits

View Google Tag Manager details | View New Relic details
MetricGoogle Tag ManagerNew RelicWinner
Performance4035Google Tag Manager
Accessibility8889New Relic
Best Practices8685Google Tag Manager
SEO9190Google Tag Manager
Security6565Tie
TTFB372ms236msNew Relic
Composite7372Google Tag Manager
Performance
Google Tag Manager
40
New Relic
35
Accessibility
Google Tag Manager
88
New Relic
89
Security
Google Tag Manager
65
New Relic
65
SEO
Google Tag Manager
91
New Relic
90
Composite
Google Tag Manager
73
New Relic
72

Google Tag Manager outperforms New Relic in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). New Relic leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Google Tag Manager

Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose New Relic

Choose New Relic when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2504 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 177 audited New Relic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Tag Manager or New Relic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Tag Manager sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Google Tag Manager or New Relic?
Google Tag Manager sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Tag Manager or New Relic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor New Relic (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Tag Manager or New Relic?
Google Tag Manager sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Tag Manager or New Relic?
New Relic sites show lower Time to First Byte (236 ms vs 372 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Tag Manager or New Relic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Tag Manager scores higher on overall composite score while Google Tag Manager may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback