Based on 2486 and 3358 real audits
| Metric | Google Tag Manager | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 45 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 88 | 89 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 86 | 87 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Open Graph |
| Security | 64 | 66 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 370ms | 358ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms Google Tag Manager in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Google Tag Manager leads in no categories.
Google Tag Manager doesn't clearly lead Open Graph in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2486 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 3358 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback