Skip to content

Google Tag Manager vs Raphael

Based on 2504 and 5 real audits

View Google Tag Manager details | View Raphael details
MetricGoogle Tag ManagerRaphaelWinner
Performance4066Raphael
Accessibility8868Google Tag Manager
Best Practices8694Raphael
SEO9184Google Tag Manager
Security6570Raphael
TTFB372ms467msGoogle Tag Manager
Composite7375Raphael
Performance
Google Tag Manager
40
Raphael
66
Accessibility
Google Tag Manager
88
Raphael
68
Security
Google Tag Manager
65
Raphael
70
SEO
Google Tag Manager
91
Raphael
84
Composite
Google Tag Manager
73
Raphael
75

Raphael outperforms Google Tag Manager in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Google Tag Manager leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Google Tag Manager

Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Raphael

Choose Raphael when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2504 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 5 audited Raphael sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Tag Manager or Raphael?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Raphael sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (66 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, Google Tag Manager or Raphael?
Raphael sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Tag Manager or Raphael?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Tag Manager (88 vs 68). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Tag Manager or Raphael?
Google Tag Manager sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 84 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Tag Manager or Raphael?
Google Tag Manager sites show lower Time to First Byte (372 ms vs 467 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Tag Manager or Raphael for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Raphael scores higher on overall composite score while Google Tag Manager may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback