Skip to content

Google Tag Manager vs Select2

Based on 2689 and 79 real audits

MetricGoogle Tag ManagerSelect2Winner
Performance4141Tie
Accessibility8887Google Tag Manager
Best Practices8687Select2
SEO9190Google Tag Manager
Security6667Select2
TTFB392ms435msGoogle Tag Manager
Composite7374Select2
Performance
Google Tag Manager
41
Select2
41
Accessibility
Google Tag Manager
88
Select2
87
Security
Google Tag Manager
66
Select2
67
SEO
Google Tag Manager
91
Select2
90
Composite
Google Tag Manager
73
Select2
74

Google Tag Manager and Select2 are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Google Tag Manager has a composite score of 73 while Select2 scores 74.

When to choose Google Tag Manager

Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Select2

Choose Select2 when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2689 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 79 audited Select2 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Tag Manager or Select2?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Tag Manager sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Tag Manager or Select2?
Select2 sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Tag Manager or Select2?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Tag Manager (88 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Tag Manager or Select2?
Google Tag Manager sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Tag Manager or Select2?
Google Tag Manager sites show lower Time to First Byte (392 ms vs 435 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Tag Manager or Select2 for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Tag Manager scores higher on overall composite score while Google Tag Manager may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback