Skip to content

Google Tag Manager vs ShareThis

Based on 2933 and 19 real audits

MetricGoogle Tag ManagerShareThisWinner
Performance4134Google Tag Manager
Accessibility8888Tie
Best Practices8786Google Tag Manager
SEO9292Tie
Security6766Google Tag Manager
TTFB421ms597msGoogle Tag Manager
Composite7473Google Tag Manager
Performance
Google Tag Manager
41
ShareThis
34
Accessibility
Google Tag Manager
88
ShareThis
88
Security
Google Tag Manager
67
ShareThis
66
SEO
Google Tag Manager
92
ShareThis
92
Composite
Google Tag Manager
74
ShareThis
73

Google Tag Manager outperforms ShareThis in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). ShareThis leads in no categories.

When to choose Google Tag Manager

Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose ShareThis

ShareThis doesn't clearly lead Google Tag Manager in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2933 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 19 audited ShareThis sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Tag Manager or ShareThis?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Tag Manager sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 34 on average).
Which has better security, Google Tag Manager or ShareThis?
Google Tag Manager sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Tag Manager or ShareThis?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Tag Manager (88 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Tag Manager or ShareThis?
Google Tag Manager sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Tag Manager or ShareThis?
Google Tag Manager sites show lower Time to First Byte (421 ms vs 597 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Tag Manager or ShareThis for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Tag Manager scores higher on overall composite score while Google Tag Manager may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback