Based on 2504 and 18 real audits
| Metric | Google Tag Manager | Tippy.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 40 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | Google Tag Manager |
| Best Practices | 86 | 84 | Google Tag Manager |
| SEO | 91 | 88 | Google Tag Manager |
| Security | 65 | 64 | Google Tag Manager |
| TTFB | 372ms | 311ms | Tippy.js |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Google Tag Manager outperforms Tippy.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Tippy.js leads in TTFB.
Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tippy.js when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2504 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 18 audited Tippy.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback