Skip to content

Google Tag Manager vs W3 Total Cache

Based on 2376 and 1 real audits

View Google Tag Manager details | View W3 Total Cache details
MetricGoogle Tag ManagerW3 Total CacheWinner
Performance4074W3 Total Cache
Accessibility8887Google Tag Manager
Best Practices86100W3 Total Cache
SEO9192W3 Total Cache
Security6460Google Tag Manager
TTFB356ms1023msGoogle Tag Manager
Composite7375W3 Total Cache
Performance
Google Tag Manager
40
W3 Total Cache
74
Accessibility
Google Tag Manager
88
W3 Total Cache
87
Security
Google Tag Manager
64
W3 Total Cache
60
SEO
Google Tag Manager
91
W3 Total Cache
92
Composite
Google Tag Manager
73
W3 Total Cache
75

W3 Total Cache outperforms Google Tag Manager in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Google Tag Manager leads in accessibility, security, TTFB.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Tag Manager or W3 Total Cache?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, W3 Total Cache sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (74 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, Google Tag Manager or W3 Total Cache?
Google Tag Manager sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 60 on average).
Should I choose Google Tag Manager or W3 Total Cache for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. W3 Total Cache scores higher on performance while Google Tag Manager may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback