Based on 2504 and 50 real audits
| Metric | Google Tag Manager | Webflow | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 38 | Google Tag Manager |
| Accessibility | 88 | 91 | Webflow |
| Best Practices | 86 | 84 | Google Tag Manager |
| SEO | 91 | 95 | Webflow |
| Security | 65 | 69 | Webflow |
| TTFB | 372ms | 227ms | Webflow |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Webflow |
Webflow outperforms Google Tag Manager in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Google Tag Manager leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Webflow when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2504 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 50 audited Webflow sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback