Based on 2764 and 52 real audits
| Metric | Google Tag Manager | Yandex.Metrika | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 46 | Yandex.Metrika |
| Accessibility | 88 | 73 | Google Tag Manager |
| Best Practices | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 65 | Google Tag Manager |
| TTFB | 403ms | 417ms | Google Tag Manager |
| Composite | 74 | 72 | Google Tag Manager |
Google Tag Manager outperforms Yandex.Metrika in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Yandex.Metrika leads in performance.
Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is accessibility and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Yandex.Metrika when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2764 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 52 audited Yandex.Metrika sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback