Based on 2504 and 47 real audits
| Metric | Google Tag Manager | Yandex.Metrika | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 45 | Yandex.Metrika |
| Accessibility | 88 | 72 | Google Tag Manager |
| Best Practices | 86 | 87 | Yandex.Metrika |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | Google Tag Manager |
| Security | 65 | 63 | Google Tag Manager |
| TTFB | 372ms | 390ms | Google Tag Manager |
| Composite | 73 | 71 | Google Tag Manager |
Google Tag Manager outperforms Yandex.Metrika in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Yandex.Metrika leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Yandex.Metrika when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2504 audited Google Tag Manager sites and 47 audited Yandex.Metrika sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback