Based on 1867 and 4 real audits
| Metric | Google Workspace | Mantine | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 48 | Mantine |
| Accessibility | 88 | 79 | Google Workspace |
| Best Practices | 87 | 86 | Google Workspace |
| SEO | 90 | 82 | Google Workspace |
| Security | 68 | 73 | Mantine |
| TTFB | 291ms | 455ms | Google Workspace |
| Composite | 74 | 78 | Mantine |
Google Workspace outperforms Mantine in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 78). Mantine leads in performance, security, composite score.
Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Mantine when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1867 audited Google Workspace sites and 4 audited Mantine sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback