Based on 1679 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Google Workspace | Mastodon | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 51 | Mastodon |
| Accessibility | 88 | 91 | Mastodon |
| Best Practices | 87 | 100 | Mastodon |
| SEO | 90 | 100 | Mastodon |
| Security | 66 | 84 | Mastodon |
| TTFB | 270ms | 207ms | Mastodon |
| Composite | 73 | 78 | Mastodon |
Mastodon outperforms Google Workspace in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 73). Google Workspace leads in no categories.
Google Workspace doesn't clearly lead Mastodon in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Mastodon when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1679 audited Google Workspace sites and 1 audited Mastodon sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback