Skip to content

Google Workspace vs Microsoft

Based on 1757 and 2412 real audits

View Google Workspace details | View Microsoft details
MetricGoogle WorkspaceMicrosoftWinner
Performance4539Google Workspace
Accessibility8889Microsoft
Best Practices8786Google Workspace
SEO9089Google Workspace
Security6766Google Workspace
TTFB276ms329msGoogle Workspace
Composite7472Google Workspace
Performance
Google Workspace
45
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
Google Workspace
88
Microsoft
89
Security
Google Workspace
67
Microsoft
66
SEO
Google Workspace
90
Microsoft
89
Composite
Google Workspace
74
Microsoft
72

Google Workspace outperforms Microsoft in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Microsoft leads in accessibility.

When to choose Google Workspace

Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1757 audited Google Workspace sites and 2412 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Workspace or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Workspace sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Google Workspace or Microsoft?
Google Workspace sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Workspace or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Workspace or Microsoft?
Google Workspace sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Workspace or Microsoft?
Google Workspace sites show lower Time to First Byte (276 ms vs 329 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Workspace or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Workspace scores higher on overall composite score while Google Workspace may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback