Based on 1987 and 67 real audits
| Metric | Google Workspace | Osano | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 31 | Google Workspace |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 87 | 85 | Google Workspace |
| SEO | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Security | 69 | 65 | Google Workspace |
| TTFB | 303ms | 316ms | Google Workspace |
| Composite | 75 | 73 | Google Workspace |
Google Workspace outperforms Osano in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Osano leads in no categories.
Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Osano doesn't clearly lead Google Workspace in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1987 audited Google Workspace sites and 67 audited Osano sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback