Based on 1987 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Google Workspace | PieEye | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 24 | Google Workspace |
| Accessibility | 88 | 100 | PieEye |
| Best Practices | 87 | 96 | PieEye |
| SEO | 90 | 100 | PieEye |
| Security | 69 | 79 | PieEye |
| TTFB | 303ms | 164ms | PieEye |
| Composite | 75 | 81 | PieEye |
PieEye outperforms Google Workspace in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 75). Google Workspace leads in performance.
Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose PieEye when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1987 audited Google Workspace sites and 1 audited PieEye sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback