Based on 1758 and 8 real audits
| Metric | Google Workspace | Pusher | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 37 | Google Workspace |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | Google Workspace |
| Best Practices | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | Pusher |
| Security | 67 | 69 | Pusher |
| TTFB | 276ms | 284ms | Google Workspace |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Google Workspace outperforms Pusher in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Pusher leads in SEO, security.
Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Pusher when your primary concern is security and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1758 audited Google Workspace sites and 8 audited Pusher sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback