Skip to content

Google Workspace vs Rubicon Project

Based on 1764 and 28 real audits

View Google Workspace details | View Rubicon Project details
MetricGoogle WorkspaceRubicon ProjectWinner
Performance4530Google Workspace
Accessibility8885Google Workspace
Best Practices8777Google Workspace
SEO9091Rubicon Project
Security6764Google Workspace
TTFB282ms347msGoogle Workspace
Composite7471Google Workspace
Performance
Google Workspace
45
Rubicon Project
30
Accessibility
Google Workspace
88
Rubicon Project
85
Security
Google Workspace
67
Rubicon Project
64
SEO
Google Workspace
90
Rubicon Project
91
Composite
Google Workspace
74
Rubicon Project
71

Google Workspace outperforms Rubicon Project in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 71). Rubicon Project leads in SEO.

When to choose Google Workspace

Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Rubicon Project

Choose Rubicon Project when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1764 audited Google Workspace sites and 28 audited Rubicon Project sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Workspace or Rubicon Project?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Workspace sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, Google Workspace or Rubicon Project?
Google Workspace sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Workspace or Rubicon Project?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Workspace (88 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Workspace or Rubicon Project?
Rubicon Project sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Workspace or Rubicon Project?
Google Workspace sites show lower Time to First Byte (282 ms vs 347 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Workspace or Rubicon Project for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Workspace scores higher on overall composite score while Google Workspace may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback