Based on 1846 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Google Workspace | Sched | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 47 | Sched |
| Accessibility | 88 | 83 | Google Workspace |
| Best Practices | 87 | 81 | Google Workspace |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | Sched |
| Security | 68 | 67 | Google Workspace |
| TTFB | 287ms | 926ms | Google Workspace |
| Composite | 74 | 77 | Sched |
Google Workspace outperforms Sched in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 77). Sched leads in performance, SEO, composite score.
Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Sched when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1846 audited Google Workspace sites and 1 audited Sched sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback