Based on 1764 and 4 real audits
| Metric | Google Workspace | Slim SEO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 58 | Slim SEO |
| Accessibility | 88 | 94 | Slim SEO |
| Best Practices | 87 | 99 | Slim SEO |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | Slim SEO |
| Security | 67 | 74 | Slim SEO |
| TTFB | 282ms | 458ms | Google Workspace |
| Composite | 74 | 80 | Slim SEO |
Slim SEO outperforms Google Workspace in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 74). Google Workspace leads in TTFB.
Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Slim SEO when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1764 audited Google Workspace sites and 4 audited Slim SEO sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback