Based on 1764 and 5 real audits
| Metric | Google Workspace | Tiny Slider | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 46 | Tiny Slider |
| Accessibility | 88 | 93 | Tiny Slider |
| Best Practices | 87 | 89 | Tiny Slider |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | Tiny Slider |
| Security | 67 | 61 | Google Workspace |
| TTFB | 282ms | 388ms | Google Workspace |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Tiny Slider outperforms Google Workspace in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Google Workspace leads in security, TTFB.
Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tiny Slider when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1764 audited Google Workspace sites and 5 audited Tiny Slider sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback