Based on 1779 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Google Workspace | Twenty Nineteen | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 32 | Google Workspace |
| Accessibility | 88 | 80 | Google Workspace |
| Best Practices | 87 | 100 | Twenty Nineteen |
| SEO | 90 | 85 | Google Workspace |
| Security | 67 | 68 | Twenty Nineteen |
| TTFB | 282ms | 401ms | Google Workspace |
| Composite | 74 | 77 | Twenty Nineteen |
Google Workspace outperforms Twenty Nineteen in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 77). Twenty Nineteen leads in best practices, security, composite score.
Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Twenty Nineteen when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1779 audited Google Workspace sites and 1 audited Twenty Nineteen sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback