Based on 1903 and 83 real audits
| Metric | Google Workspace | Ubuntu | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 54 | Ubuntu |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | Google Workspace |
| Best Practices | 87 | 91 | Ubuntu |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | Ubuntu |
| Security | 68 | 67 | Google Workspace |
| TTFB | 296ms | 484ms | Google Workspace |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | Ubuntu |
Ubuntu outperforms Google Workspace in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Google Workspace leads in accessibility, security, TTFB.
Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Ubuntu when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1903 audited Google Workspace sites and 83 audited Ubuntu sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback