Skip to content

Google Workspace vs W3 Total Cache

Based on 1679 and 1 real audits

MetricGoogle WorkspaceW3 Total CacheWinner
Performance4574W3 Total Cache
Accessibility8887Google Workspace
Best Practices87100W3 Total Cache
SEO9092W3 Total Cache
Security6660Google Workspace
TTFB270ms1023msGoogle Workspace
Composite7375W3 Total Cache
Performance
Google Workspace
45
W3 Total Cache
74
Accessibility
Google Workspace
88
W3 Total Cache
87
Security
Google Workspace
66
W3 Total Cache
60
SEO
Google Workspace
90
W3 Total Cache
92
Composite
Google Workspace
73
W3 Total Cache
75

W3 Total Cache outperforms Google Workspace in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Google Workspace leads in accessibility, security, TTFB.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Workspace or W3 Total Cache?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, W3 Total Cache sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (74 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, Google Workspace or W3 Total Cache?
Google Workspace sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 60 on average).
Should I choose Google Workspace or W3 Total Cache for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. W3 Total Cache scores higher on performance while Google Workspace may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback