Based on 10 and 974 real audits
| Metric | GOV.UK Template | Nginx | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 80 | 52 | GOV.UK Template |
| Accessibility | 99 | 86 | GOV.UK Template |
| Best Practices | 100 | 87 | GOV.UK Template |
| SEO | 98 | 91 | GOV.UK Template |
| Security | 81 | 67 | GOV.UK Template |
| TTFB | 207ms | 480ms | GOV.UK Template |
| Composite | 86 | 74 | GOV.UK Template |
GOV.UK Template outperforms Nginx in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (86 vs 74). Nginx leads in no categories.
Choose GOV.UK Template when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Nginx doesn't clearly lead GOV.UK Template in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 10 audited GOV.UK Template sites and 974 audited Nginx sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback