Based on 10 and 441 real audits
| Metric | GOV.UK Template | Varnish | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 80 | 44 | GOV.UK Template |
| Accessibility | 99 | 89 | GOV.UK Template |
| Best Practices | 100 | 89 | GOV.UK Template |
| SEO | 98 | 91 | GOV.UK Template |
| Security | 81 | 65 | GOV.UK Template |
| TTFB | 207ms | 202ms | Varnish |
| Composite | 86 | 74 | GOV.UK Template |
GOV.UK Template outperforms Varnish in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (86 vs 74). Varnish leads in TTFB.
Choose GOV.UK Template when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Varnish when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 10 audited GOV.UK Template sites and 441 audited Varnish sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback