Skip to content

Gravatar vs HSTS

Based on 15 and 2556 real audits

View Gravatar details | View HSTS details
MetricGravatarHSTSWinner
Performance5349Gravatar
Accessibility8789HSTS
Best Practices8788HSTS
SEO9191Tie
Security6370HSTS
TTFB266ms364msGravatar
Composite7475HSTS
Performance
Gravatar
53
HSTS
49
Accessibility
Gravatar
87
HSTS
89
Security
Gravatar
63
HSTS
70
SEO
Gravatar
91
HSTS
91
Composite
Gravatar
74
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms Gravatar in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Gravatar leads in performance, TTFB.

When to choose Gravatar

Choose Gravatar when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 15 audited Gravatar sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Gravatar or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Gravatar sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 49 on average).
Which has better security, Gravatar or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Gravatar or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Gravatar or HSTS?
Gravatar sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Gravatar or HSTS?
Gravatar sites show lower Time to First Byte (266 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Gravatar or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Gravatar scores higher on overall composite score while Gravatar may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback