Skip to content

Gravatar vs HSTS

Based on 20 and 3311 real audits

View Gravatar details | View HSTS details
MetricGravatarHSTSWinner
Performance5253HSTS
Accessibility8890HSTS
Best Practices8989Tie
SEO9392Gravatar
Security6673HSTS
TTFB378ms403msGravatar
Composite7678HSTS
Performance
Gravatar
52
HSTS
53
Accessibility
Gravatar
88
HSTS
90
Security
Gravatar
66
HSTS
73
SEO
Gravatar
93
HSTS
92
Composite
Gravatar
76
HSTS
78

HSTS outperforms Gravatar in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 76). Gravatar leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Gravatar

Choose Gravatar when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 20 audited Gravatar sites and 3311 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Gravatar or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 52 on average).
Which has better security, Gravatar or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Gravatar or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Gravatar or HSTS?
Gravatar sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Gravatar or HSTS?
Gravatar sites show lower Time to First Byte (378 ms vs 403 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Gravatar or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Gravatar may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback