Based on 4 and 1857 real audits
| Metric | Gravity Forms | jQuery | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 45 | Gravity Forms |
| Accessibility | 91 | 86 | Gravity Forms |
| Best Practices | 99 | 87 | Gravity Forms |
| SEO | 92 | 90 | Gravity Forms |
| Security | 66 | 65 | Gravity Forms |
| TTFB | 277ms | 438ms | Gravity Forms |
| Composite | 77 | 73 | Gravity Forms |
Gravity Forms outperforms jQuery in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). jQuery leads in no categories.
Choose Gravity Forms when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
jQuery doesn't clearly lead Gravity Forms in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 4 audited Gravity Forms sites and 1857 audited jQuery sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback