| Metric | Gravity Forms | RSS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 49 | RSS |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 95 | 89 | Gravity Forms |
| SEO | 87 | 91 | RSS |
| Security | 72 | 67 | Gravity Forms |
| TTFB | 679ms | 430ms | RSS |
| Composite | 78 | 75 | Gravity Forms |
Gravity Forms and RSS are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Gravity Forms has a composite score of 78 while RSS scores 75.
Choose Gravity Forms when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose RSS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 7 audited Gravity Forms sites and 1007 audited RSS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback