Skip to content

GSAP vs HSTS

Based on 249 and 2601 real audits

View GSAP details | View HSTS details
MetricGSAPHSTSWinner
Performance3447HSTS
Accessibility8888Tie
Best Practices8687HSTS
SEO9190GSAP
Security6670HSTS
TTFB352ms364msGSAP
Composite7375HSTS
Performance
GSAP
34
HSTS
47
Accessibility
GSAP
88
HSTS
88
Security
GSAP
66
HSTS
70
SEO
GSAP
91
HSTS
90
Composite
GSAP
73
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms GSAP in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). GSAP leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose GSAP

Choose GSAP when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 249 audited GSAP sites and 2601 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, GSAP or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (47 vs 34 on average).
Which has better security, GSAP or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, GSAP or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor GSAP (88 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, GSAP or HSTS?
GSAP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), GSAP or HSTS?
GSAP sites show lower Time to First Byte (352 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose GSAP or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while GSAP may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback